• Users Online: 670
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
CLINICAL IMAGE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 88-89

Hysteroscopy as a tool for identification of uterine endocervical lesion


1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, De La Salle University Medical Center, Dasmarinas, Cavite City, Philippines
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mutah University, Merwed, Al Karak, Jordan

Date of Web Publication2-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kuan-Gen Huang
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 33305
Taiwan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_15_18

Get Permissions


How to cite this article:
Valino MC, Yen CF, Huang KG, Uwais A. Hysteroscopy as a tool for identification of uterine endocervical lesion. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2018;7:88-9

How to cite this URL:
Valino MC, Yen CF, Huang KG, Uwais A. Hysteroscopy as a tool for identification of uterine endocervical lesion. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Sep 19];7:88-9. Available from: http://www.e-gmit.com/text.asp?2018/7/2/88/231757



A 65-year-old menopausal woman consulted regarding 3-week duration of vaginal spotting, for which transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) was done and showed an 8.2-mm thickened endometrium with dilated cavity and suspicious endocervical lesion [Figure 1]. The following day, hysteroscopy was performed which revealed a proliferative phase endometrium and papillary outgrowth at the endocervical canal, for which a biopsy was obtained [Figure 2]. Histopathological report showed atypical complex hyperplasia, suggestive of endometrioid carcinoma. Two weeks later, she underwent laparoscopic staging surgery (total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, Para-aortic lymph nodes dissection, peritoneal cytology). Final pathology account was well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma in atypical complex hyperplasia, T1aN1 and metastatic adenocarcinoma on the right pelvic nodes.
Figure 1: Transvaginal ultrasound showing thickened endometrium and suspicious endocervical lesion (black arrow)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Hysteroscopy image showing papillary outgrowth at the endocervix (black arrow)

Click here to view


Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer has become standard of care with benefits that include shorter hospital stay and improved quality of life in the postoperative period. Moreover, a preoperative method for determination of cancer spread has the advantage in operative planning, in selecting women for minimally invasive surgery, and in ensuring that any extensive surgery is performed only for women considered at high risk for extrauterine cancer invasion.

The presence of cervical involvement in patients with endometrial cancer has a greater risk of extrauterine spread such as nodal metastasis and serosal invasion.[1] Both TVS and hysteroscopy are very observer-dependent techniques, Where in diagnostic errors may be accounted for, and the ability to recognize and differentiate between normal and pathologic anatomy is part of the technical skill.

TVS is simplest, low cost, least invasive, and easily accessible and has been advocated as a routine modality of choice for gynecologic diagnosis before any plan for treatment is initiated. Invasion of the cervix by TVS is diagnosed when the neoplastic tissue distended the cervix and showed ill-defined borders with the cervical stroma, irregular and heterogenous endometrial echogenicity overcoming a dilated internal cervical ostium, or disruption of the normal endocervical image with irregular or inhomogenous echogenicity, discrete hypoechogenicity or increased echogenicity.[2],[3],[4] However, in this case, only a “suspicious” endocervical lesion was noted.

Office hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive diagnostic procedure that is now considered as the “gold standard” in the diagnosis of malignant endometrial pathology because it provides direct panoramic visualization of the uterine cavity and the cervical canal, provides precise clinical evaluation of lesions and abnormalities, and permits the option of taking biopsy samples. Major hysteroscopic features of the malignancy spreading into the cervix are presence of exophytic lesions that originate from the cervical walls, irregularities in the cervical surface and contours of isthmus, and increased and accentuated vascularization of the cervical mucosa,[5] which were clearly demonstrated in this case image.

Most authors agree that a hysteroscopic examination, performed with modern instrumentation at low intracavitary pressure, is virtually devoid of any risk of intraperitoneal spillage and therefore is still considered a first-line modality in the diagnostic and therapeutic workup of endometrial carcinoma.[5] Therefore, preoperative detection of possible cervical spread or its absence in uterine cancer is best done by hysteroscopy, and it is the most practically useful tool for making individualized management plans to decrease morbidity and avoid overtreatment in low-risk patients. Cost-efficiency is always an important factor when making a choice, and it is likewise prudent to consider the quality of life after treatment, especially in cancer patients.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Morimura Y, Soeda S, Hashimoto T, Takano Y, Ohwada M, Yamada H, et al. The value of pre-operative diagnostic procedures for cervical involvement in uterine corpus carcinoma. Fukushima J Med Sci 2000;46:1-1.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Cicinelli E, Marinaccio M, Barba B, Tinelli R, Colafiglio G, Pedote P, et al. Reliability of diagnostic fluid hysteroscopy in the assessment of cervical invasion by endometrial carcinoma: A comparative study with transvaginal sonography and MRI. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:55-61.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Toki T, Oka K, Nakayama K, Oguchi O, Fujii S. A comparative study of pre-operative procedures to assess cervical invasion by endometrial carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:512-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Akbayir O, Corbacioglu A, Numanoglu C, Guleroglu FY, Ulker V, Akyol A, et al. Preoperative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma by transvaginal ultrasound. Gynecol Oncol 2011;122:600-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Nappi C, Di Spiezio Sardo A. State-of-the-art Hysteroscopic Approaches to Pathologies of the Genital Tract. Ch. 6. Endo-Press. 2014. p. 72 9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed785    
    Printed76    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded112    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal