|
| |
 |
|
| CASE REPORT |
|
| Year : 2019 | Volume
: 8
| Issue : 4 | Page : 185-187 |
|
Successful pregnancy outcome immediately after methotrexate treatment for cesarean section scar pregnancy
Ibrahim A Abdelazim1, Mohannad Abu-Faza2, Gulmira Zhurabekova3, Svetlana Shikanova4, Sakiyeva Kanshaiym4, Bakyt Karimova4, Mukhit Sarsembayev4, Tatyana Starchenko4
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ahmadi Hospital, Kuwait Oil Company, Ahmadi, Kuwait; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ahmadi Hospital, Kuwait Oil Company, Ahmadi, Kuwait
3 Department of Normal and Topographical Anatomy, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov State Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov State Medical University, Aktobe, Kazakhstan
| Date of Submission | 03-Jan-2019 |
| Date of Decision | 21-Jan-2019 |
| Date of Acceptance | 07-Mar-2019 |
| Date of Web Publication | 24-Oct-2019 |
Correspondence Address:
Prof. Ibrahim A Abdelazim
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ahmadi Hospital, Kuwait Oil Company, P. O. Box: 9758, 61008 Ahmadi
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | 5 |
DOI: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_134_18
A 27-year-old cesarean section scar pregnancy (CSSP) case diagnosed by the vaginal ultrasound which showed gestational sac located in the lower uterine anterior quadrant close to the site of the previous scars (with yolk sac inside) with β-hCG 15,373 mIU/ml in September 2017 was managed by intramuscular (IM) multidose methotrexate (MTX). The studied woman discharged home when the β-hCG decreased to 11,630 mIU/ml on the 1st week after the first MTX dose. On the 5th week after the first dose of IM-MTX, the β-hCG dropped to zero and the gestational sac completely disappeared. She was counseled about the risk of pregnancy in the first 6 months after the MTX and the possibility of the CSSP recurrence. She presented on December 16, 2018, with preterm delivery at 35 weeks' gestation. After delivery, her neonate admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) due to mild respiratory distress and discharged from the NICU on the 4th day in good condition. Multi-dose MTX regimen for the treatment of CSSP supported by many authors with follow-up by β-hCG and vaginal ultrasound. This report highlights the successful outcome immediately after the proper management of CSSP cases.
Keywords: Cesarean section scar pregnancy, methotrexate, pregnancy
How to cite this article:
Abdelazim IA, Abu-Faza M, Zhurabekova G, Shikanova S, Kanshaiym S, Karimova B, Sarsembayev M, Starchenko T. Successful pregnancy outcome immediately after methotrexate treatment for cesarean section scar pregnancy. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2019;8:185-7 |
How to cite this URL:
Abdelazim IA, Abu-Faza M, Zhurabekova G, Shikanova S, Kanshaiym S, Karimova B, Sarsembayev M, Starchenko T. Successful pregnancy outcome immediately after methotrexate treatment for cesarean section scar pregnancy. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 May 16];8:185-7. Available from: https://www.e-gmit.com/text.asp?2019/8/4/185/267118 |
| Introduction | |  |
Cesarean section scar pregnancy (CSSP) is an intrauterine pregnancy that occurs following implantation of the gestational sac over the previous uterine scars.[1]
Previous uterine scar is the only risk factor for CSSP. The true incidence of CSSP estimated as 1/1800–1/2500 of all cesarean deliveries,[1] and the incidence of CSSP increased due to increased rate of cesarean deliveries and improved imaging tools.[2]
The CSSP is often misdiagnosed as inevitable miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy.[3]
This report highlights the successful outcome immediately after the proper management of CSSP cases.
| Case Report | | |
A 27-year-old CSSP case diagnosed by the vaginal ultrasound which showed gestational sac located in the lower uterine anterior quadrant close to the site of the previous scars (with yolk sac inside) with β-hCG 15373 mIU/ml in September 2017 was managed by intramuscular (IM) multi-dose methotrexate (MTX). IM-MTX injection was alternating with leucovorin (active form of folic acid). She was followed up by the β-hCG, vaginal ultrasound, and hematological parameters.
The studied woman discharged home when the β-hCG decreased to 11,630 on the 1st week after the first MTX dose.
On the 5th week after the first dose of IM-MTX, the β-hCG dropped to zero and the gestational sac completely disappeared. She was counseled about the risk of pregnancy in the first 6 months after the MTX and the possibility of the CSSP recurrence.
She presented at December 16, 2018, with preterm delivery at 35 weeks' gestation (the last dose of MTX was taken on October 5, 2017, and her 1st day of the LMP was April 14, 2018). After delivery, her neonate admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) due to mild respiratory distress and discharged from the NICU in the 4th day in good condition.
Written consent was taken from the studied woman and approval from the local ethical committee of the obstetrics and gynecology department to use the patient's medical records and data for publication and medical education.
| Discussion | | |
CSSP was diagnosed in women with previous uterine scar (s) based on positive pregnancy test and the following ultrasound findings:[3],[4] (1) empty uterus, (2) gestational sac located in the lower uterine anterior quadrant close to the site of the uterine scar with closed cervix(s) [Figure 1] ± yolk sac [Figure 2] ± fetal pole and/or heart-beats; (3) thin layer of myometrial muscles between the gestational sac and the bladder wall, and (4) multiple vessels around the gestational sac indicating the placental implantation site. | Figure 1: Transvaginal ultrasound showing cesarean section scar pregnancy
Click here to view |
 | Figure 2: Transvaginal ultrasound shows cesarean section scar pregnancy with yolk sac inside
Click here to view |
The CSSP without fetal cardiac activity and no yolk sac and/or fetal echo can be managed by the ultrasound and β-hCG follow-up ± IM-MTX.[3]
The CSSP with fetal cardiac activity can be managed either termination or continuation of the pregnancy. The continuation of pregnancy increases the risk of hemorrhage and emergency hysterectomy.[3]
The risk of CSSP recurrence is 1% and the treatment of CSSP should be individualized based on the patient's age and future fertility.[4]
The suggested treatments for CSSP are (1) surgical excision with subsequent uterine repair, (2) suction aspiration followed by balloon compression or hysterectomy (3). MTX (local and/or systemic).[5],[6],[7],[8]
MTX is the most common treatment option for CSSP including (1) systemic single-dose IM-MTX regimen of 1 mg/kg of body weight,[5] (2) systemic multi-dose IM-MTX regimen,[7] (3) local MTX injection inside the gestation sac (ultrasound guided) is the most effective treatment for CSSP between 6–8 weeks' gestation (it stopped fetal cardiac activity and considered if future fertility desired).[5]
Embolization of the uterine artery with intra-gestational MTX treatment or ultrasound-guided local and systemic MTX treatment was similarly effective in treating CSSP and both treatment likely to fail for CSSP with gestational sac >5 cm.[9]
The studied CSSP case managed according to the protocol by systemic multi-dose IM-MTX with follow-up by β-hCG, vaginal ultrasound, and blood picture. On the 5th week after the first dose of IM-MTX, the β-hCG dropped to zero and the gestational sac completely disappeared.
Multi-dose IM-MTX regimen for CSSP with ultrasound and biochemical (β-hCG) follow-up was recommended by many authors.[3]
The β-hCG returned to nonpregnant level 6 weeks after the multi-dose MTX regimen for the treatment of CSSP.[10]
Uludag et al. compared the use of systemic and local MTX in the treatment of CSSP, and they found that the mean times for β-hCG normalization and the uterine-mass disappearance were significantly shorter in local MTX group than in systemic MTX group.[10]
However, oral ulcers[10] with decreased hematological parameters recorded as side effects of multi-dose IM-MTX treatment for CSSP.[10]
The studied woman did not develop any complication or side effects following the multi-dose IM-MTX regimen. This report represents the first case of successful pregnancy outcome immediately after multi-dose IM-MTX treatment for CSSP to highlight the successful outcome immediately after the proper management of CSSP cases.
| Conclusion | | |
There is no single best treatment to terminate the CSSP and the procedure with the least complications should be selected. Multi-dose MTX regimen for the treatment of CSSP was supported by many authors with follow-up by β-hCG and vaginal ultrasound.
This report highlights the successful outcome immediately after the proper management of CSSP cases.
Ethical approval
The local Obstetrics and Gynecology Department Ethical Committee of Ahmadi hospital has approved this study. The Institutional Review Board Project (approval number) OBGYN_REC_18.12.20 obtained on 20th December in 2018.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to woman agreed and gave consent to publish her data as a case report.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Gao L, Huang Z, Zhang X, Zhou N, Huang X, Wang X, et al. Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy – A case series and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;200:102-7.  |
| 2. | Fu LP. Therapeutic approach for the cesarean scar pregnancy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e0476. |
| 3. | Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, Vintzileos A, Viscarello R, Al-Khan A, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:346-53. |
| 4. | Gupta S, Pineda G, Rubin S, Timor-Tritsch IE. Four consecutive recurrent cesarean scar pregnancies in a single patient. J Ultrasound Med 2013;32:1878-80. |
| 5. | Yin XH, Yang SZ, Wang ZQ, Jia HY, Shi M. Injection of MTX for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: Comparison between different methods. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7:1867-72. |
| 6. | Kutuk MS, Uysal G, Dolanbay M, Ozgun MT. Successful medical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies with systemic multidose methotrexate: Single-center experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40:1700-6. |
| 7. | Wang DB, Chen YH, Zhang ZF, Chen P, Liu KR, Li Y, et al. Evaluation of the transvaginal resection of low-segment cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2014;101:602-6. |
| 8. | Wang Z, Shan L, Xiong H. Transvaginal removal of ectopic pregnancy tissue and repair of uterine defect for cesarean scar pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2013;40:546-7. |
| 9. | Wang M, Yang Z, Li Y, Chen B, Wang J, Ma X, et al. Conservative management of cesarean scar pregnancies: A prospective randomized controlled trial at a single center. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:18972-80. |
| 10. | Uludag SZ, Kutuk MS, Ak M, Ozgun MT, Dolanbay M, Aygen EM, et al. Comparison of systemic and local methotrexate treatments in cesarean scar pregnancies: Time to change conventional treatment and follow-up protocols. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;206:131-5. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Comparison of D&C and hysteroscopy after UAE in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy |
|
| Lili Cao, Zhida Qian, Lili Huang | | Medicine. 2022; 101(3): e28607 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Clinical efficacy of transvaginal laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of type II cesarean section scar pregnancy and its effect on postoperative rehabilitation |
|
| Yujun DONG, Huijuan NI, Jiali SHEN, Yaqin FANG | | Minerva Surgery. 2021; 76(5) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Modalities of Ectopic Pregnancies: A Literature Review |
|
| Ibrahim A. Abdelazim, Mohannad AbuFaza, Svetlana Shikanova, Bakyt Karimova | | EMJ Reproductive Health. 2021; : 83 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different surgical strategies for patients with type II cesarean scar pregnancy |
|
| Qi Cheng,Qi Tian,Kai-Kai Chang,Xiao-Fang Yi | | Reproductive and Developmental Medicine. 2020; 4(2): 89 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Evaluation of treatment of previous cesarean scar pregnancy with methotrexate: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
|
| Nader Salari,Mohsen Kazeminia,Shamarina Shohaimi,Anis al-Dawlah Nankali,Masoud Mohammadi | | Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2020; 18(1) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
Search Pubmed for