|
| |
 |
|
| CLINICAL IMAGE |
|
| Year : 2019 | Volume
: 8
| Issue : 4 | Page : 192-193 |
|
Hysteroscopic intrauterine adhesiolysis resulting in positive reproductive outcome
Pooja Choudhary1, Vinita Singh2
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Senior Consultant Apollo Cradle Royale, New Delhi, India
2 Deaprtment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AIMS, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| Date of Submission | 21-Jan-2019 |
| Date of Decision | 08-Mar-2019 |
| Date of Acceptance | 07-May-2019 |
| Date of Web Publication | 24-Oct-2019 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Vinita Singh
Deaprtment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, AIMS, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_126_18
Intrauterine adhesions (IUA) following any less invasive uterine procedure like curettage or due to genital tuberculosis can lead to partial or complete dysfunction of the endometrium due to adhesions and uterine scarring with impairment of fertility and menstruation and also recurrent pregnancy loss. Therefore, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was beneficial in this case in restoring fertility, and hence, the introduction of hysteroscopy has definitely improved the fertility outcome and positive reproductive outcome. This is a case report of a 28-year-old infertile woman with IUA leading to bilateral corneal block following dilatation and curettage who conceived after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.
Keywords: Asherman syndrome, dilatation and curettage, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, intrauterine adhesions
How to cite this article:
Choudhary P, Singh V. Hysteroscopic intrauterine adhesiolysis resulting in positive reproductive outcome. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2019;8:192-3 |
How to cite this URL:
Choudhary P, Singh V. Hysteroscopic intrauterine adhesiolysis resulting in positive reproductive outcome. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 May 16];8:192-3. Available from: https://www.e-gmit.com/text.asp?2019/8/4/192/268977 |
Intrauterine adhesions (IUA) following any invasive uterine procedure like curettage or following any genital infections like tuberculosis can lead to partial or complete dysfunction of the endometrium due to adhesions and uterine scarring with impairment of fertility and menstruation and also recurrent pregnancy loss.[1],[2],[3] Gravid uterus is supposed to be more susceptible to such trauma. There are case reports where the presence of IUA is not associated with any symptoms in the patients so the term of Asherman syndrome (AS) should be should be used with caution.[3] Hence, AS should be defined by the presence of adhesions inside uterine cavity and/or endocervix whereby derives one or more clinical manifestations such as amenorrhea, hypomenorrhea, recurrent pregnancy loss, infertility, and history of abnormal placentation.[4] A 28-Year-old female, P2A2, presented to outpatient department with secondary infertility. She had previous two normal vaginal deliveries following spontaneous conception. Last child birth was 7 years back. In the next 5 years, it was followed by two spontaneous abortions for which dilatation and curettage were done in both the cases. She gave no significant history suggestive of any congenital anomalies in her genital tract or any ultrasound abnormalities featured in her previous sonography report and images done during her those uneventful pregnancies. There was no history of any contraception, operative intervention, or any genital tract infection during the antepartum, intrapartum, or postpartum period. The patient was sincerely trying to conceive for the last 2 years but was unable to conceive. Her menstrual cycles were regular with normal flow and showed no significant variation since menarche in amount, duration, or flow. She gave no significant past medical or surgical history and no history of any congenital anomalies of uterus in the family. As a routine protocol of infertility workup, both patient's and her husband's all required tests were done, but every report was within normal limits including ultrasonography report which showed no significant finding. The patient had also undergone endometrial biopsy which showed no signs of any ovulatory dysfunction or any tubercular infection. The patient was then advised for hysterosalpingography which showed bilateral cornual block following which the patient was posted for diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy. On hysteroscopy [Figure 1]a, [Figure 1]b, [Figure 1]c, [Figure 1]d, [Figure 1]e, [Figure 1]f, a full-thickness adhesive band was seen running from anterior to posterior wall near to the fundus of the uterus encroaching upper one-third of the uterine cavity. Initially, both the cornua were not visualized. Hence, the adhesions were cut with the help of scissors under hysteroscopic guidance. Tubal patency was also checked, and bilateral spillage was present. Her postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient could conceive in the very next cycle and delivered a healthy male baby vaginally at term. Therefore, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was beneficial in this case in restoring fertility. Introduction of hysteroscopy has definitely improved the fertility outcome and positive reproductive outcome.[2],[3],[5] Recurrence rates of AS remain high, and we must continue to look for techniques which reduce the formation of new adhesions. | Figure 1: Step-by-step (a-f) illustration of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. (a) Adhesion band. (b-d) Cutting of adhesion band. (e) Right cornua visualized. (f) Left cornua visualized
Click here to view |
Ethical approval
The institute academic committee has gave the ethical approval, and the approval no.12/IAC was obtained on 20th August in 2019.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | |  |
| 1. | Asherman JG. Traumatic intra-uterine adhesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1950;57:892-6.  |
| 2. | Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC. Asherman syndrome – One century later. Fertil Steril 2008;89:759-79. |
| 3. | Deans R, Abbott J. Review of intrauterine adhesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:555-69. |
| 4. | Conforti A, Alviggi C, Mollo A, De Placido G, Magos A. The management of Asherman syndrome: A review of literature. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2013;11:118. |
| 5. | March CM. Management of Asherman's syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23:63-76. |
[Figure 1]
|
Search Pubmed for